Friday, January 27, 2017

WHAT ABOUT GITMO?

SPECIAL POST

Lost in the post-election shuffle has been the question of what we are going to do about the terrorist prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.  Although Barack Hussein did not succeed in closing down the facility, he did succeed in reducing the number of detainees to 41.  The costs associated with running and maintaining such a facility for just 41 prisoners is horrendous, to say the least.  On the other hand, the bad dudes locked up there deserve to never get out; in fact, they probably should have been shot before they made it to the prison walls.  

Well, there are more candidates for imprisonment out there.  Obama and his henchmen downplayed the fact that a large number of released detainees ended up actively back in the terrorist killing fields and those guys should be at the top of the list for recapture.  There are plenty of new and fresh terrorists out there as well; some of them have even committed terrible acts right here in the U.S.  Why not send anybody convicted of acts of terrorism here in the U.S. to serve his sentence at Gitmo?   Come to think of it, didn't Madonna threaten to blow up the White House?  Isn't that an act of terrorism?  

We could also toss in any Mexican drug cartel members convicted of federal crimes while we're at it.  Michael Moore, of course, would be an ideal candidate; he could send up sharing a cell with El Chapo.  

The point being, it's there and it's despised as well as feared by most of our real enemies.  Let's return it to good use.  

That's MY AMERICAN OPINION, respectfully submitted. 
 

No comments: