Friday, September 22, 2017

DID ILLEGAL UNMASKING PERSIST AFTER TRUMP'S INAUGURATION?

News breaking Wednesday was that illegal unmasking of those Trump team members under surveillance continued at least until the inauguration, according to a FOX NEWS investigation.  "Two sources, who were not authorized to speak on the record, said the requests to identify Americans whose names surfaced in foreign intelligence reporting, known as unmasking, exceeded 260 last year. One source indicated this occurred in the final days of the Obama White House."

One has to ask, since we all know that Obama employees continue to work in various government positions even today, is whether or not these unmasking continued into the Trump administration and whether or not they continue to this day.

Every hour of every day that goes by brings more revelations  about the extent of the rampant corruption and illegal activities during the Obama years.  Why has nobody been prosecuted?  Mr. Sessions, is this the "new American normal," where those in our government can get away with anything?   

That's MY AMERICAN OPINION, respectfully submitted.  

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

HILLARY FINALLY SET TO OFFICIALLY CHALLENGE ELECTION RESULTS

While barely managing to hold back tears and at the same time lamenting that Trump conspired with the Russians to steal her just and due election to the presidency, Hillary Clinton has announced she may well challenge the results of that election which occurred ten months ago.  

And all of the left wing loons, the Democrats, the progressives, the "establishment," the media, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell... they're all so, so atwitter!  

When are we going to wake up from this endless nightmare? 

That's MY AMERICAN OPINION, respectfully submitted.  
 

Monday, September 18, 2017

IS WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ GUILTY OF ESPIONAGE?

Why would the Pakastani I.T. guy who worked for Debbie Wasserman-Schultz be storing her documents and DNC information on a separate hard drive?  Why was Wasserman-Schultz so adamantly opposed to an investigation into possible hacking of the DNC computers?  Why did she raise holy hell about getting her laptop which her IT aide was using back from the Capitol police?  Why, unlike any other Congressional Member, did she continue to employee this guy after an investigation began into his nefarious activities?  

It is now alleged that Imran Awan transferred massive amounts of information, including government documents and emails, to his own private Dropbox account in the sky, allowing him to access the information even after he was blocked from DNC networks. 

And just what did Awan intend to do with this information he was gathering?  Certainly, he did not intend to save it to give to his grand-children; he undoubtedly intend to sell it.  What was he going to do with all of the profits?  Could it be he was going to  split them with someone in order to guarantee continued access to the information for as long as possible? 

If so, who would most logically be that "someone, and would the information being compromised be of any use to the presidential campaign of one Hillary Rodham Clinton?" 

That's MY AMERICAN OPINION, respectfully submitted.   
 

Friday, September 15, 2017

NORTH KOREAN MISSILE LAUNCH: AN ACT OF WAR

North Korea got a pretty stern warning when it launched its last missile straight over Japan.  Then the United Nations has just piled on more sanctions and the little bastard has fired off another missile... over Japan.  

With the slightest technological mistake or equipment malfunction, that missile would come down in Japan or on one of our ships and kill hundreds, if not thousands of people.  Japan also has sovereign jurisdiction over the airspace above its nation.  

This was an act of aggression tantamount to war and needs to be treated as such.  

That's MY AMERICAN OPINION, respectfully submitted.  
 

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

Monday, September 11, 2017

A NAVAL BLOCKADE OF NORTH KOREA MAKES NO SENSE

It sounds good, but think about it.  

Who supplies North Korea with military and nuclear technology?   Who continued to trade with them when they profess not to?  Who wants North Korea to be a continued thorn in our side?  Who wants to start a war, but doesn't want to be blamed for it?  

China. 

And every map I read indicates that China is directly connected to North Korea by land.  

So, won't a naval blockade be just symbolic?  

When are we going to quite pussy-footing around this issue and get serious?  

That's MY AMERICAN OPINION, respectfully submitted.