I have been asked repeatedly who I like for President in
2012. Of course, people want me to make
my own insignificant endorsement. I do
get a lot of crazy reactions when I say “Obama,” probably because people who
follow my writings know full well how much I despise the weenie.
There is a school of thought out there that the emphasis
should be on who can beat Obama. The
theory is that Obama must go and that the Republican selection for an opponent
should be based solely on who has the best chance to beat him. My answer to that is, “How about Genghis
Khan? Would you prefer him over
Obama? Or, how about Pee Wee Herman?”
Indeed, we all know what we want in a President. We want someone who can bring the opposite
sides of Congress together in the common purpose of working with the President
to resolve the serious issues that are facing our nation today, and in the most
expeditious manner possible. You can add
a few lines to that, but I’m sure I have basically summed it up and it doesn’t
involve getting rid of Obama. The plain
simple fact is that, if you find someone who fits this job description, Obama cannot
and will not ever get rehired.
Who among the candidates best fits that description?
Frankly, I think the only candidate who can work both
parties in Congress is Newt Gingrich. His
experience and track record as Speaker of the House working with both Clinton
and the Republicans produced the “Contract for America.” No other candidate, in my opinion, has that
ability.
We also need someone with business understanding and
expertise. I would say that Mitt Romney
and Herman Cain both fit that trait quite well.
But, we both know that Mitt is elusive and, I think, a closet liberal;
after all, haven’t you heard of Romney Care?
Regardless of Romney’s pledge to trash ObamaCare, Romney was the true
author of the concept. That speaks to
his liberalism and warped thought processes.
Herman, on the other hand, also has a great business track record and he’s
very obviously much more conservative than Romney.
Finally, we want someone who is patriotic to the bone,
someone who will make decisions for the country that are based on what is best
for the country in light of our rich democratic heritage. I think Romney is a tad selfish in that
respect, but Gingrich, Cain and Bachmann are definitely not. Bachmann has become a victim of the far-left
liberal attacks on the Tea Parties, but she has demonstrated a keen interest in
the financial affairs of the country and endless patriotism.
So, at the moment I like Gingrich, Cain and Bachmann. I don’t know that either Cain or Bachmann can
being Congress together so that we can accomplish what needs to be
accomplished. Frankly, I am inclined to
suggest that Bachmann can do far more to help us in this direction as a Member
of Congress; we need all of the help there we can get.
But, those three are my picks to go forward. Of the three, I think Gingrich could best debate Obama, but that is not MY sole criterion. At some point in the near future I will come
forth with an endorsement and a recommendation on how to go forward. What will happen in the not too distant
future is that those who do not stand a chance will drop out and endorse
somebody. Percentages will change. But the fact is that Romney hangs in at
20-25% consistently which means that 75-80% of Republicans would prefer someone
else. Just because the liberal media
insists that he has the best chance of beating Obama is not a valid reason to
back him.
For once, I think all of us would like to be in the position
of voting for the guy we like as opposed to having to vote for the lesser of
two evils. Let’s work together to make
it shape up that way.
That’s MY AMERICAN OPINION, respectfully submitted.