IS WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ GUILTY OF ESPIONAGE?

Why would the Pakastani I.T. guy who worked for Debbie Wasserman-Schultz be storing her documents and DNC information on a separate hard drive?  Why was Wasserman-Schultz so adamantly opposed to an investigation into possible hacking of the DNC computers?  Why did she raise holy hell about getting her laptop which her IT aide was using back from the Capitol police?  Why, unlike any other Congressional Member, did she continue to employee this guy after an investigation began into his nefarious activities?  

It is now alleged that Imran Awan transferred massive amounts of information, including government documents and emails, to his own private Dropbox account in the sky, allowing him to access the information even after he was blocked from DNC networks. 

And just what did Awan intend to do with this information he was gathering?  Certainly, he did not intend to save it to give to his grand-children; he undoubtedly intend to sell it.  What was he going to do with all of the profits?  Could it be he was going to  split them with someone in order to guarantee continued access to the information for as long as possible? 

If so, who would most logically be that "someone, and would the information being compromised be of any use to the presidential campaign of one Hillary Rodham Clinton?" 

That's MY AMERICAN OPINION, respectfully submitted.